<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Full On Design &#187; users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/tag/users/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk</link>
	<description>Design &#38; Web Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>5 Awful 1.0 Ideologies (Which people still believe)</title>
		<link>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/907-5-awful-10-ideologies-which-people-still-believe.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/907-5-awful-10-ideologies-which-people-still-believe.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 23:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unwanted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 1.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are ideologies from the Web 1.0 era which moron &#8220;webmasters&#8221; (I use this term sparingly) seem to still use. In most cases it just makes a website annoying and difficult to use. 1. &#8220;If there is automatically playing music and videos, it will get a users attention&#8221; Unfortunately not. All this does is aggravating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are ideologies from the Web 1.0 era which moron &#8220;webmasters&#8221; (I use this term sparingly) seem to still use. In most cases it just makes a website <a href="http://www.phoenixrealm.com/annoying-websites/">annoying</a> and difficult to use.</p>
<h3>1. &#8220;If there is automatically playing music and videos, it will get a users attention&#8221;</h3>
<p>Unfortunately not. All this does is aggravating users who are startled by an unknown (and unwanted) audio source. This will obliviously lead to users closing your web browser just to stop the annoying voice. In a recent piece of research by Full On Design in regard to what people like and dislike about websites, one respondent said when asked about automatically playing sales pitches:</p>
<blockquote><p>I hate it when some annoying sales crap comes up, as it interrupts my music or podcasts [...] normally I would instantly close the website which is to blame.<br />
 <em>Anonymous Respondent</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-907"></span></p>
<h3>2. &#8220;If I use a big red font all in uppercase, they will notice &amp; remember it&#8221;</h3>
<p>No, this technique just makes your website aesthetically displeasing, which will just make it look like you&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
<h3>3. &#8220;I need everything on one page&#8230;that way users have less clicking to do&#8221;</h3>
<p>The &#8220;less clicking&#8221; has a point here, users are lazy creatures the more they have to click and type the more unwilling to take in your message they will become. You can try this for yourself, try not using your keyboard while surfing the web, you will be surprised how little you actually end up using it.</p>
<p>However loads of text on a single page will lead to &#8220;information overload&#8221;. In the study cited above, we also found that most users tend to read headings before deciding whether to read an entire web page, in some cases the user stopped reading after three 150 word paragraphs (Hint: Use images, shorter paragraphs and headings to break up content into more bite size chunks).</p>
<h3>4. &#8220;I need to put ads everywhere to make money&#8221;</h3>
<p>Unfortunately not true. In this web 2.0 generation users have become essentially blind to blatant advertising, in some cases <a href="http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/how-to-block-and-filter-out-annoying-ads-in-firefox/">users actively block adverts</a>. Users are in fact more likely to click inline adverts (Where an advert is placed into the content), for example I could write an article being very positive about a service available and receive a small payment from that company.</p>
<h3>5. &#8220;Buying traffic is a great way to increase sales&#8221;</h3>
<p>This is very dependent on the type of traffic you&#8217;re receiving. If your purchasing traffic and users return or buy your product then its money well spent. If a user visits then leaves then you have essentially just flushed your money down the drain. Here is what an expert said on the topic:</p>
<blockquote><p>For many years a large number of small websites purchased traffic in the hope that an increase in traffic would increase sales. In reality very few websites saw a return on the investment they made.<br />
 <em>Dan, <a href="http://xdnet.co.uk/">XDnet.co.uk</a></em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, lots of webmasters still have these outdated ideologies. Luckily though, they tend not to rank well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/907-5-awful-10-ideologies-which-people-still-believe.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overview: Call to action</title>
		<link>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/310-overview-call-to-action.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/310-overview-call-to-action.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call to action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A “Call to Action” is marketing jargon for an action you wish you users to complete, for example “Sign up now” or “Add to cart”. Without them users will be confused about what you want them to exactly do on your website, but too many will frustrate users and possibly confuse them. Below are some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A “Call to Action” is marketing jargon for an action you wish you users to complete, for example “Sign up now” or “Add to cart”. Without them users will be confused about what you want them to exactly do on your website, but too many will frustrate users and possibly confuse them.</p>
<p>Below are some examples of good and bad calls to action.</p>
<p><strong>Facebook</strong></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-319" title="facebook" src="http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/facebook.png" alt="facebook" width="400" height="200" /></p>
<p>Only 2 calls to action, but the login button fit in seamlessly with the layout (not taking attention away from the sign up, especially for new users). The page also only gives the information required to know what Facebook does, sign up in 1 click and login.</p>
<p>Note: the “Sign Up” button is the only green button on the page (it stands out like a sore thumb).</p>
<p><strong>MySpace</strong></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-320" title="myspace" src="http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/myspace.png" alt="myspace" width="400" height="200" /></p>
<p>6 Calls to action (too many), the user is somewhat overloaded with information. The tabs are inconsistent and link to unnecessary information.</p>
<p><strong>Amazon</strong></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-317" title="amazon" src="http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/amazon.png" alt="amazon" width="400" height="200" /></p>
<p>No clear login or sign up button (Seriously Amazon, you make it look like I am logged in but I’m not). However there is only 1 clear call to action (Search).</p>
<p><strong>eBay</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-318 aligncenter" title="ebay" src="http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ebay-300x150.png" alt="ebay" width="300" height="150" /></p>
<p>3 calls to action, essentially &#8220;Search&#8221;, &#8220;Register&#8221; and &#8220;login&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Useful Links</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.schipul.com/en/art/?4" target="_blank">Your Web Site Needs a Clear Call to Action</a><br />
 <a href="http://boagworld.com/design/10_techniques_for_an_effective/" target="_blank">10 techniques for an effective &#8216;call to action&#8217;</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.getelastic.com/cart-button-size/" target="_blank">Call To Action Buttons &#8211; Does Size Matter?</a><br />
 <a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Web-Design---Have-You-Forgotten-the-Call-to-Action?&amp;id=729645" target="_blank">Web Design &#8211; Have You Forgotten the Call to Action?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fullondesign.co.uk/design/usability/310-overview-call-to-action.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
